The ACLU of Southern California today called on Mayor Riordan to appoint an independent, blue-ribbon civilian commission to review thoroughly the operations and policies of the LAPD in the wake of the growing scandal rocking the department. "The City Council's vote to increase resources to the present Police Commission is insufficient to bring about the necessary reform," ACLU executive director Ramona Ripston pointed out. "The corruption and brutality that have surfaced in the last six months have been festering for years. The present Commission failed in its oversight function, despite years of outcry from community members who have been trying to bring this problem to the public's attention."

"In addition to full and broad subpoena power and an investigative staff independent of the police department, the new, blue-ribbon commission must be given a mandate to look beyond the confines of the Rampart CRASH unit," Ripston continued. "The systemic problems will not be uncovered by the police policing itself, and they have not been uncovered by the present Police Commission. We believe that for true reform to be properly implemented, the new commission must continue its work after it makes its policy recommendations. One of the failings of the Christopher Commission was the lack of follow-through; many of the meaningful reforms suggested were never implemented."

Earlier today, the ACLU announced a regional newspaper ad campaign calling upon Mayor Riordan to take action and bring accountability to the LAPD. The full-page ad will appear in the Wednesday, February 16, 2000 western region edition of the New York Times, as well as other local newspapers.

The ad decries Riordan's inaction in the face of revelations of systemic corruption within the LAPD, and calls for Riordan to appoint an independent commission charged with investigating the scandal and overseeing the following reforms:

-The complete overhaul of the LAPD complaint process, which currently does more to discourage civilians from reporting officer misconduct than to keep police misconduct in check.

-The creation of a special prosecutor's office to investigate police corruption independently, with the power to subpoena and prosecute corrupt officers to the full extent of the law.

"We are all familiar with Mayor Riordan's crusade for accountability, but as this most recent scandal clearly shows, there will never be true accountability within the LAPD so long as civilians are routinely prevented from bringing police abuse to light and to justice," says Ramona Ripston, executive director of the ACLU of Southern California. "It is past time for the Mayor to stop defending the status quo and to implement meaningful civilian review of the LAPD, once and for all."

Date

Tuesday, February 15, 2000 - 12:00am

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

68

Style

Standard with sidebar

The ACLU of Southern California filed a federal lawsuit today seeking to block the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) from the practice of "racial profiling," in which officers stop and search nonwhite motorists based on the color of their skin. The case sheds further light on this discriminatory practice, which violates the basic guarantees of liberty and equality firmly embedded in the U.S. Constitution and our nation's civil rights laws.

The ACLU brought the suit on behalf of three black and two Latino men who, within the past year, were subjected to five separate encounters with the LAPD as they drove to work or to their homes.

The suit recounts how the LAPD followed, stopped, and detained each of these men, for no valid reason. "The stated grounds for the stops were trumped-up and phony," said Ramona Ripston, the ACLU's Executive Director. "In reality, they committed no offense but were stopped for 'driving while black or brown,' or 'DWB'. There is no way in the world what happened to them would have occurred if they were white."

Alberto Lovato, a professional musician and preschool teacher, was followed for over two miles by the LAPD, ordered out of his truck at gun point, forced to lie face down on the ground, handcuffed, searched, and accused of being a gang member, all before the police looked at his driver's license and vehicle registration -- or even asked for them.

The experiences of Carlos Gonzalez, a public school math teacher, and Timothy Campbell, a licensed realtor and building contractor, were strikingly similar. In both cases, LAPD officers made U-turns to follow Gonzalez and Campbell, and both were ordered out of their vehicles by police officers, Campbell at gunpoint. Gonzalez and Campbell were searched and told that they had been stopped because the police suspected that they had stolen their cars. Twenty minutes passed before the police asked either Gonzalez or Campbell for their driver's licenses and registration, during which time Gonzalez was handcuffed. In both instances, the police concocted false after-the-fact stories that Gonzalez and Campbell had been speeding.

David Askew, an actor, was followed by LAPD on a deserted street after midnight. He was stopped, handcuffed, and accused by officers, whose hands were primed on their holstered guns, of being a dangerous criminal suspect. Askew contested the speeding ticket the police finally issued, and it was thrown out of court.

Tonye Allen, a freelance photographer, was trailed for at least a half a mile in the early hours of the morning. He shifted lanes several times, believing that police officers wanted to pass him. Yet the police continued to follow him, shifting lanes each time Allen did. Ultimately, Allen was stopped and told that he had been impeding traffic, even though there were no other vehicles on the road except for the police car. Allen's ticket for driving too slowly was also voided by the traffic court.

"What these men have endured at the hands of their police is, sadly, a daily reality for motorists of color in Los Angeles," said ACLU Staff Attorney Catherine Lhamon. "Through this lawsuit, these men seek to eradicate the injustice of racial profiling by the police and to end the terror persons of color feel when stopped and scrutinized'often at gunpoint and in handcuffs'for no valid reason."

Last year, Governor Gray Davis vetoed a bill that received strong bipartisan support in the legislature, which would have required law enforcement agencies in California to collect and maintain data on the race or ethnicity of drivers who are stopped by the police. At least seventy municipalities throughout California have agreed voluntarily to gather and keep this data. Los Angeles has refused to take even this first step -- despite clear evidence of a problem. In 1999, the ACLU instituted a statewide DWB hotline (1-877-DWB-STOP) and discovered that an overwhelming number of cases were generated in Southern California.

'The suit filed today seeks justice for five men who were victimized by the very officers sworn to protect and serve them, solely on the basis of their skin color. A police department cannot function effectively if it does not have the trust of the community that it serves," said Michael Small, the ACLU's Chief Counsel. "Here, in Los Angeles, that trust has been severely eroded in recent months in the wake of an unprecedented police corruption scandal that has seen revelations that the LAPD fabricated evidence and framed individuals for crimes that they did not commit. What happened to Carlos Gonzalez, Tonye Allen, David Askew, Timothy Campbell, and Alberto Lovato is further evidence of a police department that has utter disregard and even contempt for civil rights and civil liberties."

Date

Thursday, February 10, 2000 - 12:00am

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

68

Style

Standard with sidebar

"Regardless of who my family is or where they come from, I have the right to be as equal a citizen as any other in America"

In response to a lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California filed last week, the National Security Agency has agreed to 'fairly and fully'' review an application for their prestigious Undergraduate Training Program by a young man previously rejected for consideration based solely on the fact that he resides with an elderly grandmother who is not a U.S. citizen. The ACLU filed the action, Edward Doe v. National Security Agency (CV00-45 RT), last Thursday on behalf of a high school senior of Taiwanese descent with a straight-A GPA at Riverside Poly High School, who applied to the NSA's Undergraduate Training Program in November 1999.

The program provides full college tuition and other benefits for students who commit to working for the NSA after college graduation. Along with academic transcripts that show him to have placed in the 99th percentile on both the verbal and math SATs, Edward wrote, 'I believe my credentials show I am a nearly ideal candidate for your program. In addition, I have no doubt about my loyalty to the United States - I was born in Cleveland, Ohio, and I consider myself an American above everything else. To serve my country in the NSA would be a dream ...'

Although Edward is a U.S.-born citizen, the NSA denied his application solely because he lives with his elderly grandmother who, while in this country legally, is not a U.S. citizen. The ACLU's complaint against the NSA states 'The rejection of Mr. Doe's application, without any consideration of its merits, directly violates his rights to equal protection, due process, free association and the privileges and immunities of U.S. citizenship.'

"Over a half-century ago, the United States government categorically deemed Asian Americans to be a security risk, sending over 100,000 to internment camps merely because of their Japanese ancestry,' said ACLU staff attorney Dan Tokaji. 'Sadly, this case reveals that discrimination by the United States government is not just a thing of the past. We are pleased that the National Security Agency has agreed to give full and fair consideration to Edward's application. Now, the NSA must change its discriminatory policy, so that other qualified applicants are not denied the opportunity to serve their country merely because of their ancestry."

Edward praised the NSA's decision to re-evaluate his application. "I'm grateful that the NSA has decided to accept my application, but I hope that everyone else rejected or dissuaded from the NSA for the same reason will get the same chance I do."

Date

Friday, February 4, 2000 - 12:00am

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Criminal Justice and Drug Policy Reform

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

68

Style

Standard with sidebar

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU of Southern California RSS