Report

A Vision for Safe and Supportive Schools in California

Over the past few decades, police have become a dominant fixture in California schools. Their presence has devastating and discriminatory impacts on tens of thousands of California students.

Policing in the U.S. has historical roots in slave patrols, which violently abducted Black people who escaped enslavement, and in the forced dislocation of indigenous youth to “boarding schools” designed to erase their cultural ties. As communities across the country came together to reevaluate the role of police in enacting racism in the wake of George Floyd’s murder by police officers, youth activists effectively continued to advocate to remove police from schools. Since then, school districts in Oakland, Los Angeles, Pomona, and Claremont, among others, have fully eliminated or made progress towards eliminating school police.

“No Police in Schools: A Vision for Safe and Supportive Schools in CA” analyzes data from the U.S. Department of Education’s 2017-18 Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC), the 2019 California Racial and Identity Profiling Act (RIPA) Stops dataset, and data from Stockton Unified School District on police in schools. The data conclusively show harmful and discriminatory policing patterns in schools. School police contribute to the criminalization of tens of thousands of California students, resulting in them being pushed out of school and into the school-to-prison pipeline. Critically, the data suggest that schools underreport the number of assigned law enforcement officers, so these problems are likely even more severe.

Download the report (.pdf)

KEY FINDINGS

Students were far more vulnerable to arrest and referrals to police in schools with assigned law enforcement than in schools without.

  • Black students’ arrest rates are 7.4 times higher in schools with assigned law enforcement than in schools without, and their law enforcement referral rates are 4.7 times higher.
  • Latine students’ arrest rates are 6.9 times higher in schools with assigned law enforcement than in schools without, and their law enforcement referral rates are 4.4 times higher.
  • Students with disabilities’ arrest rates are 4.6 times higher in schools with assigned law enforcement than in schools without, and their law enforcement referral rates are 4.8 times higher.

Law enforcement proponents attempt to explain the correlation between police in schools and heightened rates of arrests and referrals by speciously arguing that schools with assigned permanent law enforcement officers are inherently more dangerous. Baldwin Park Unified School District serves as an instructive counterexample to this assertion. From 2010 to 2017, the district had no police on staff. It then hired six officers in September 2017 and increased the police force to nine officers in 2019. Law enforcement referrals more than doubled to 347 in the 2017-18 CRDC after the district hired the police officers. Critically, during that time, arrests actually fell from 70 to 52, suggesting that the officers were called for issues that did not warrant arrests and should have been handled by school staff.

No Police in Schools Table

School police disproportionately arrest and cite Black students, Latine boys, and students with disabilities.

 

  • Black students are three times more likely to be referred to law enforcement compared to white students.
  • Black girls are six percent of California’s female student population but 18 percent of female student arrests.
  • Latine boys are 28 percent of California’s students but 44 percent of student arrests.
  • Students with disabilities are 11 percent of California’s students but 26 percent of student arrets.
  • Black and Latine boys with disabilities are five percent of California’s students but 13 percent of referrals to law enforcement and 15 percent of school arrests.

The 2019 RIPA data confirm that police disproportionately stop Black students and subject them to harsher consequences.

  • Black students are only 7.6 percent of students in schools in the dataset but represent 26 percent of law enforcement stops of students aged 5 to 19 by California’s 15 largest police agencies.
  • Police handcuffed 15.7 percent of all students stopped in response to calls for service and 27.1 percent of all Black students stopped in response to calls for service.
  • Police arrested only 12 percent of white students but 20 percent of Black students during stops.

A detailed analysis of policing in Stockton Unified School District also confirms the trends seen in the statewide data.

  • From 2017 to 2020, Native American students were booked or cited by Stockton USD police at five times their rate of enrollment in school, and Black students were booked or cited at nearly three times their rate of enrollment.
  • In 2019, Black students were six-and-a-half times more likely than white students to be booked or cited by Stockton USD police, and Native American students were over three times more likely than white students to be booked or cited by Stockton USD police.

“I want the removal of police from schools, starting IMMEDIATELY with elementary and middle schools. There is no situation that should require constant or even regular police presence with children so young. Please do not make the mistake of being yet another system that has taught children of color that they do not matter.” – Current Los Angeles USD Student

 


RECOMMENDATION

No school in California should have a permanent police officer. School districts should not be able to create their own police departments or reserve forces, nor should they coordinate with any outside law enforcement agency to station law enforcement on a school campus. 

To achieve justice for our youth and to provide them with the education they deserve, we must reevaluate the entire system: reimagining safety without police and school hardening measures, reinvesting in the positive supports that actually help our students, and fundamentally changing the culture of our schools.


RESOURCES

Date

Tuesday, August 24, 2021 - 8:30am

Featured image

No Police in Schools

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Related issues

Education Equity

Documents

Show related content

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Share Image

No Police in Schools

Type

Menu parent dynamic listing

69

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Standard with sidebar

Show list numbers

This update to our 2017 report on patterns of excessive force by police in Kern County documents Bakersfield Police Department’s ("BPD") continued use of unconstitutional practices, including excessive force and use of canines to attack and seriously injure members of the public. Updated data in the report confirms that BPD remains one of the deadliest police departments in California and the country and continues to use criminal charges, such as “resisting arrest," to preempt and defend against allegations of excessive force or racial profiling.

Deficient oversight and accountability structures have allowed law enforcement misconduct to go unchecked and in some cases escalate. Changes to BPD policies, training, and institutional structures are therefore required to ensure that officers carry out their duties lawfully, ethically, and safely — consistent with the Constitution and respect for the sanctity of life.

READ THE FULL REPORT FOR MORE.

If you've experienced excessive force or other violations of your rights by Bakersfield Police Department officers or Kern County Sheriff's Office deputies, please let us know.

Date

Thursday, August 12, 2021 - 10:00am

Featured image

Unconstitutional Bakersfield Police Department

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Documents

Show related content

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Share Image

Unconstitutional Bakersfield Police Department

Type

Menu parent dynamic listing

69

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Standard with sidebar

Show list numbers

Report Analyzes Criminalization and Displacement of Unhoused People in Lancaster

Unhoused residents in Lancaster, a sprawling community along the northern outskirts of Los Angeles County, must somehow find a way to survive the harsh climate of the Mojave Desert. Instead of ensuring that all residents have access to life-saving housing and services, city officials’ primary response has been to organize a dragnet of aggressive enforcement designed to cite and jail community members for being unhoused and banish them to the high desert in unincorporated Los Angeles County. 

Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department (LASD) officers are contracted to provide police services in Lancaster, and as part of this function, they enforce the ordinances that criminalize homelessness. They also use their authority to harass and banish unhoused community members to the high desert by threat of citation. 

An investigation by the ACLU SoCal finds that Lancaster’s campaign to criminalize and banish its unhoused community members is not only cruel—it is also potentially deadly. Furthermore, it is unlawful. 

Banished and Abandoned: Criminalization and Displacement of Unhoused People in Lancaster is compiled from interviews with 53 unhoused Lancaster residents, engagement with local activists and organizations working on homelessness issues in the region, and a review of thousands of publicly available records. 

Date

Monday, February 22, 2021 - 9:15am

Featured image

Banished and Abandoned in Lancaster

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Related issues

Economic Justice Houselessness

Documents

Show related content

Pinned related content

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Share Image

Banished and Abandoned in Lancaster

Type

Menu parent dynamic listing

69

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Standard with sidebar

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Report