After decades of advocacy by community and grassroots organizations, California is making significant strides toward criminal and juvenile justice. This past year, Los Angeles County’s new district attorney began working to end cash bail for misdemeanors, enact new sentencing policies, and stop the transfer of children to adult court. Meanwhile, a 2020 state law and a budget directive from the governor’s office have resulted in plans to close all three of California’s juvenile prisons by 2023.  

These reforms recognize the need to address egregious racial disparities and the criminalization of poverty that are both hallmarks of these systems. Despite these efforts, a large gap will remain if we do not also take a critical look at how these same problems exist within our child welfare and foster care system—our family regulation system.  

This system creates a broad web for government surveillance of and grievous harm to Black, Indigenous, and other families of color with little accountability.  

L.A. County maintains the largest child welfare agency in the country, and alarming racial disparities exist within the family regulation system: 

  • Black children make up 27.8% of children in the L.A. County Department of Children and Family Services’ (DCFS) custody, despite only making up 7.5% of children in the county.  
  • In 2018, Black children made up 15.9% of children in the Riverside County foster care system, despite making up only 5.3% of the county population.   
  • A staggering 58% of Black children in L.A. will be subjects of a DCFS investigation before they are 18.  
  • Despite laws adopted to explicitly protect Indigenous children from being removed from their families and communities, the proportion of Indigenous children in foster care is 2.6 times higher than their representation in the total child population.   
  • About half of all Indigenous children in California will experience a child welfare investigation before they are 18. 

The family regulation system also impacts low-income families. A broad definition of neglect frequently pulls in families struggling with houselessness, lack of childcare, or access to basic resources. Instead of providing parents with the support necessary to raise their children, the system funds removing children and system-appointed caretakers. L.A. County refuses to help pay for services that parents are ordered to obtain by Child Protective Services, while paying foster care providers to care for children who are removed from their homes.  

The United States has a long history of family separation. Beginning in the 1600s, during chattel slavery, family separation was a common condition of bondage used to threaten parents and prevent strong familial bonds. From the 1800s to 1900s, California’s Apprenticeship Laws incentivized the kidnapping of Indigenous children so they could be sold as indentured servants to white families, oftentimes also resulting in the murder of Indigenous parents seeking to protect them. During the same period, Indigenous children were also removed from their families and their reservations to be sent to boarding schools under genocidal assimilationist policies resulting in the systemic erasure of their culture through generations. 

Today, the removal of Black and Indigenous children in our country and immigrant families at the U.S.-Mexico border is a continuation of this country’s family separation history.   

Our family regulation system remains as entrenched and harmful as our criminal legal system, and, in fact, work in tandem. Many incarcerated and newly released parents struggle for years to reunify with their children to no avail. Children in foster care are frequently involved in the juvenile legal system that it is known as the “foster care-to-prison pipeline.” One study found that by age 17, over half of youth in foster care experienced an arrest, conviction, or overnight stay in a correctional facility.  

It is time to reimagine child safety.   

This week, the Reimagine Child Safety Coalition issued demands to the L.A. County Board of Supervisors to take immediate action to protect families. Join the campaign to end law enforcement partnerships with DCFS.  

Date

Monday, November 15, 2021 - 3:15pm

Featured image

reimagine child safety

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Share Image

reimagine child safety

Related issues

Police Practices Gender Equity and Reproductive Justice

Show related content

Author:
Ariana Rodriguez

Related bios

Menu parent dynamic listing

68

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Standard with sidebar

The Legal War Against Unhoused People

The plight of people who are unhoused has reached horrific proportions in California, but instead of embarking on a resurgence of affordable housing, communities have instead instituted policies and regulations that target unhoused people by harassing, citing, segregating, banishing, and even imprisoning them.

A new, comprehensive report, “Outside the Law: The Legal War Against Unhoused People,” by the ACLU Foundations of Northern California, Southern California, and San Diego & Imperial Counties spotlights the discriminatory tactics that cities and counties throughout California have instituted to target unhoused people, ignoring the bedrock principle of equal treatment under the law. It calls upon communities to amend anti-discrimination laws to include unhoused people and acknowledge their fundamental human rights.  

Read the full report

The report finds that:

  • Discrimination against unhoused people is spreading and becoming more commonplace, especially due to local governments exploiting legal loopholes and sharing their tactics with one another. 
  • Municipalities are increasingly imposing fines and fees — even for sitting in a public park for only a few minutes — far beyond an unhoused person’s ability to pay. 
  • Cities are targeting not just unhoused people, but also the humanitarian organizations that provide critical aid such as food, water, clothing, and blankets.
  • Unhoused people are being forcibly banished to remote areas, including harsh desert landscapes, outside city borders, and far from lifesaving resources such as water, food, and health care.

The ordinances and regulations adopted by cities are often purposely vague as to allow for harassment. An example cited in the report is from the city of Novato where camping was banned in city parks, open spaces, within 50 feet of “critical infrastructure,” etc. When asked where unhoused people could exist, the city manager answered, “Anywhere it’s not illegal would be legal.” 

Other California cities whose policies and practices against unhoused people are cited in the report include: Chico, Laguna Beach, Lancaster, Los Angeles, San Diego, Santa Ana, and Santa Cruz.

Read the full report

Date

Tuesday, October 26, 2021 - 6:15am

Featured image

Outside The Law

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Related issues

Economic Justice

Documents

Show related content

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Share Image

Outside The Law

Type

Menu parent dynamic listing

69

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Standard with sidebar

Show list numbers

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU of Southern California RSS