Ruthelle Frank was able to vote in Tuesday's primary elections in Wisconsin. But it took multiple lawsuits and 10 months to make it happen. And she still may not be able to vote in November. Ruthelle is the ACLU’s 84-year-old plaintiff challenging Wisconsin’s voter ID law. She is only one of millions of people who are at risk of losing their right to vote this November as a result of wide-ranging state-by-state efforts to deny people access to the polls.
mytubethumb play
%3Ciframe%20src%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube-nocookie.com%2Fembed%2Fvideoseries%3Flist%3DUU7M42vQrNmZ0tnmmenLWwBA%26amp%3Bhl%3Den_US%26autoplay%3D1%26version%3D3%26playsinline%3D1%22%20frameborder%3D%220%22%20width%3D%22480%22%20height%3D%22274%22%20allow%3D%22autoplay%22%3E%3C%2Fiframe%3E
Privacy statement. This embed will serve content from youtube-nocookie.com.
Please note that by playing this clip You Tube and Google will place a long-term cookie on your computer. Please see You Tube's privacy statement on their website and Google's privacy statementon theirs to learn more. To view the ACLU's privacy statement, click here.
The right to vote is what makes a country a true democracy, and it is the most basic right we share as Americans. And yet, outrageous attempts to deny people the right to vote are under way in state after state — virtually guaranteeing that many Americans won’t really have the right at all. It’s estimated that up to 5 million people will be blocked from the polls in this year’s general election as a result of new voter suppression measures on the books.
The ACLU is launching Let People Vote today, a campaign that highlights stories of voters across the country who will be impacted by these voter suppression measures. From Wisconsin to Texas, Ohio to South Carolina, every person who loses the right to vote takes us one more step away from being a nation of free people.
Act now to make sure that our most fundamental rights are protected this November.

Date

Thursday, April 5, 2012 - 7:35pm

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

68

Style

Standard with sidebar

LA WEEKLY: Director Duncan Roy casts a courtly image of a baronial figure as he sits in his home atop Las Flores Canyon, a modernist, Bohemian hideaway with a jaw-dropping view of the Pacific. His surroundings project an image of California's creative lifestyle at its most alluring. But in February, Roy found himself standing alone outside Los Angeles County Men's Central Jail, released after three months of harrowing and wrongful incarceration.

During his ordeal, he learned to dodge angry Los Angeles County Sheriff's jailers and to trade with fellow prisoners for dried ramen toppings. He was helplessly trapped in a Kafka-esque corner of America's immigration war, where he disappeared into the bowels of the system without explanation or apparent legal recourse.

In 2006, Roy was an up-and-coming star of the British independent-film community. His first picture, AKA, had received notice and awards around the world, and he followed the well-worn path to Hollywood in search of a bigger canvas — in particular, a film adaptation of The Picture ofDorian Gray, to which he was attached to direct. He purchased the Las Flores house with the help of his then-boyfriend, a Malibu real estate agent who later would be featured on Bravo's Million Dollar Listing.

Five years later, the dream had fizzled. The relationship with his partner had ended. The Dorian Gray film hadn't materialized. Roy even sought counsel from Dr. Drew on his show Sex Rehab, where the director's outspoken manner made him a reality-TV cause célèbre. A bout with cancer led to the removal of one of Roy's testicles. With his visa due to expire in December 2011, he prepared a move to his apartment in Berlin.

But in Los Angeles, the most tangled dramas ultimately come back to real estate. Selling the house was proving thorny. Once it was on the market, geological issues arose, dramatically lowering its value. Then, Roy says, he received a middle-of-the-night phone call from someone claiming to be the geologist who had worked on the house's assessment. He told Roy that he had been pressured to cover up problems in the foundation but, having become a born-again Christian, felt obliged to come clean.

Roy called his ex-boyfriend and, Roy recalls, "I said, 'You've conned me out of $500,000, and why don't you take the house back? I'll give you the house back for $500,000 — or I could just blog about what you've done to me.' I threatened to blog about him."

Thus began Roy's trip into the twilight zone.

The next day, Nov. 17, he got a call from a Sheriff's Department deputy asking for a meeting. His former lover is an influential figure in Malibu, and Roy briefly "wondered if it was a setup," but he met the deputy at Country Kitchen on Pacific Coast Highway. He was stunned when the deputy arrested him for "extortion," and took him to the Sheriff's station at Hidden Hills, the same facility whose deputies gained infamy in the disappearance and accidental death of Mitrice Richardson in Malibu Canyon. Roy was booked, fingerprinted, questioned and placed in a cell. (His ex-boyfriend did not respond to the Weekly's requests for comment.)

Roy viewed his arrest as an overreaction, which was sure to be cleared up soon. He was offered release on bail. But then something happened. The deputies told Roy's bondsmen they could not accept his bail or release him because he had been placed on an "immigration hold."

Such holds begin with a notification from the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency(ICE) to local law enforcement. The Sheriff's Department is a partner in the federal Secure Communities program, which is aimed at removing "dangerous criminal aliens" from the United States. When Roy, a legal resident of the United States, was fingerprinted, his data were forwarded to ICE, which issued the surprising "hold" notice.

This is where things get murky. By ICE's protocol, its "hold" is merely a 48-hour restraint. Local authorities are essentially told that if somebody is about to go free on bail, they should hold them briefly until ICE can pick them up — at which time ICE will determine whether or not they should be deported.

Sheriff Lee Baca, however, takes a different view, classifying an ICE hold like an outstanding warrant for arrest, and uses that technicality to refuse to release such people on bail. The department's spokesman, Steve Whitmore, says Baca is not happy with the broad net cast by Secure Communities, but nevertheless, "If a legitimate agency puts a hold on an individual, we need to respond to that. It is not our practice to ignore a legitimate law enforcement request."

As a result, when ICE requests that a person granted bail be held briefly until ICE can pick them up, the Sheriff's Department interprets this as allowing deputies to ignore court orders granting bail.
This was the never-ending Möbius strip Duncan Roy suddenly found himself on.

He says he spent the first night in a cold holding cell with no blanket, while his attorney, bail bondsman and an immigration lawyer tried to find out why the hold had been placed, who could lift it or how to persuade the Sheriff to release Roy pending some sort of review.

Article by Richard Rushfield

Date

Thursday, April 5, 2012 - 7:15pm

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Criminal Justice and Drug Policy Reform Immigrants' Rights

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

68

Style

Standard with sidebar
Seeing and hearing prisoners who have experienced prolonged solitary confinement is not easy. The emotional and physical damage done to prisoners held in solitary does not present a pretty picture. It is not easy for anyone to learn the truth about solitary confinement, but for people of faith at least two important tenets of faith make solitary unacceptable. As religious people, we believe that everyone has been given by their creator dignity and worth. Solitary confinement degrades those gifts. In addition, faith teaches us that human beings thrive in community. That does not mean that people will not occasionally choose time alone to enhance their faith journey, but denying human beings the community they need is unacceptable.
Because we therefore believe solitary confinement is morally wrong, the National Religious Campaign Against Torture (NRCAT) has produced a film called Solitary Confinement: Torture in Your Backyard. The film makes the case that solitary is damaging.
The film features interviews with ex-prisoners from the supermax prison in Maine as well as the families of prisoners currently in solitary confinement in Maine and Virginia, who describe the effects of prolonged solitary confinement.
The film also includes an interview with Sarah Shourd, one of the three American hikers captured near the Iranian border, who was held for 14 months in solitary confinement. Sarah describes the changes in her perceptions and thought-patterns as well as in her emotions. She recalls one time she was screaming and when the guards came into her cell to calm her, she then realized that she had been screaming. Another time, she was pounding on the walls, but didn’t know she was doing so. She finally figured it out because her knuckles and the wall were bloody.
The film also tells the story of the role of the religious community in Maine in reducing the number of prisoners in solitary confinement. The work of NRCAT, the Maine Council of Churches, the Maine Civil Liberties Union and other advocates led to the Maine Legislature passing a resolve that required the Department of Corrections to review its use of isolation and report its findings. Accordingly, the Maine Department of Corrections prepared a report that included many recommendations to improve due process and other policies related to the placement of prisoners in solitary confinement and reported it to the legislature. Prompted by those recommendations, the Maine Department of Corrections cut the number of prisoners held in solitary confinement by over 70 percent in 2011.
Solitary Confinement: Torture in Your Backyard urges people of faith to develop similar legislative efforts in their states. As people of faith, we are called to speak for those in our community who have no voice – the poor, orphaned, and imprisoned.
I hope you will watch Solitary Confinement: Torture in Your Backyard and work to end prolonged solitary confinement in this country. Learn more about what you can do and watch the film here.

Date

Wednesday, April 4, 2012 - 7:36pm

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Religious Liberty

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

68

Style

Standard with sidebar

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU of Southern California RSS