On January 11, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in Garland v. Gonzalez, the latest in a series of cases the court has taken on immigration detention. The case presents a basic question: whether the federal government can lock immigrants up, for months or even years, without a hearing to determine if your detention is justified. And the Biden administration is decidedly on the wrong side of this fight.

Listen to the argument

The plaintiffs in Gonzalez are all people who were previously deported from the U.S., but came back because they faced persecution or torture in their countries of origin. One plaintiff, Arturo Martinez, was kidnapped by police officers after being deported to Mexico, tortured, and held for ransom. Another, Eduardo Gutierrez, was tortured by gang members because of his sexual orientation. 

Arturo, Eduardo, and others like them were all screened by an asylum officer upon their return to the U.S.; all were found to have a bona fide claim to protection, and all were referred for legal proceedings to decide their protection claims. Under the immigration laws, they were legally entitled to remain in the country while their cases were being heard. But because of court backlogs, cases can take years to conclude, meaning that people are routinely detained for extremely long periods of time.

The issue before the Supreme Court is what process people like Arturo and Eduardo are entitled to, in order to determine if they should stay locked up or can be safely released to their families and communities. In the preceding decision, the Ninth Circuit interpreted the detention laws to require a bond hearing before an immigration judge after six months, based on its recognition that prolonged detention without a hearing raises serious due process concerns. This follows from long standing Supreme Court precedent recognizing that when it comes to civil detention, the touchstone for due process is a hearing before a neutral decision-maker to decide if someone’s imprisonment is justified. These protections are all the more critical when the government locks people up for months or years.

Yet despite its pledge to deliver a fair and humane immigration system, the Biden administration does not see things the same way. Instead, the Department of Justice argues that no hearings are required here because immigrants get paper “file reviews,” done solely by ICE — the jailer. But we know from experience that an ICE “file review” is no substitute for a hearing before a judge. Instead, ICE uses these reviews to rubber stamp detention for months or years, based on arbitrary reasons, or no reasons at all. 

Even worse, denying people bond hearings can have life-threatening consequences. ICE’s record of abuse, neglect, and death makes clear that detention is dangerous — a fact that has only become clearer during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ultimately, because detention cannot be made safe and humane, ICE must shut down its mass detention machine. But in the meantime, the government must at least provide due process to ensure that people are given a meaningful chance at release.

Beyond the denial of bond hearings, there’s another way in which the Biden administration has picked the wrong side of this fight. The administration argues that a provision of the immigration laws prevents federal courts from entering a standard form of relief in civil rights cases — a class-wide injunction — in cases challenging the government’s detention and deportation practices. Practically, this is a systemic attack on immigrants’ rights.

The overwhelming majority of detained immigrants do not have lawyers, are unfamiliar with U.S. law, and often lack English language proficiency. These barriers to entry mean that most immigrants have no idea what legal claims they may have when their rights are abused, much less the resources to file individual lawsuits. Class actions and class-wide injunctions have thus been essential tools for advocates and courts to ensure that the government follows the law in its treatment of immigrants — tools that the Biden administration now wants eliminated. An administration that’s committed to fairness has no business trying to strip immigrant communities of one of the primary bulwarks for their rights. To say that the Biden administration is punching down is an understatement.

After the horrors of the prior administration, we had hoped for a Biden administration that would choose the right side of history and be serious about protecting immigrant communities. Instead, Gonzalez is yet another disappointment. But no matter what, the ACLU stands ready to fight for a future America where immigrants have the same rights, dignity, and freedom as everyone else — especially when their government fails them. 

Date

Monday, January 10, 2022 - 8:45am

Featured image

Immigration case

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Share Image

SCOTUS case

Related issues

Immigrants' Rights

Show related content

Author:
Michael Tan

Menu parent dynamic listing

68

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Standard with sidebar

Teaser subhead

A case before the Supreme Court will determine whether immigrants have access to a bond hearing to justify detention, and whether advocates can use a critical tool to bring them relief.

Show list numbers

The 2021 Bill of Rights Awards honored celebrities, activists, and leaders speaking truth to power. In an age of disinformation, this year’s honorees have upheld facts and called attention to uncomfortable truths about our country. They have reminded us of the critical role that truth plays in our democracy and challenged us to continue fighting misinformation, even when it is inconvenient or unpopular.  

Click an image quote below to hear from the honorees and see performances from special guests. 

Joan BaezMarlee Matlin, and Sir Elton John presented the Bill of Rights Award to Dr. Anthony Fauci, who became a towering voice of reason during the COVID-19 pandemic. 

Amy Landecker and Bradley WhitfordNina Tassler, and Senator Elizabeth Warren paid tribute to Ady Barkan for his tireless advocacy for universal healthcare. 

America Ferrera presented the Bill of Rights Award to Patrisse Cullors, co-founder of Black Lives Matter and artist, who invites us to join the call for abolition and lead with love. 

Alexander Chee, Andrew Sean Greer, Bowen Yang read from Cathy Park Hong’s book Minor Feelings: An Asian American Reckoning. Claudia Rankine presents to Cathy Park Hong, who calls for inclusion and spaces for communities that have been systematically excluded. 

STARZ #TakeTheLead initiative was honored for leading the industry in showing what is possible when networks and talent work together for greater media representation. Watch STARZ President and CEO Jeffrey Hirsch in conversation with Monica Raymund.

"Somehow You Do"
MEGHAN KABIR 
Meghan Kabir singing

"Racist Sexist Boy"
THE LINDA LINDAS 
The Linda Lindas

"Secret Sister"
RUFUS WAINWRIGHT 
Rufus Wainwright

The 2021 Bill of Rights Awards also featured appearances from special guests Judd Apatow, Jason George, Isabella Gomez, Todd Grinnell, H.E.R., Amy Hill, Norman Lear, John Legend, Alyssa Milano, Jaclyn Moore, Rita Moreno, and Diane Warren. 


Watch the 2021 Bill of Rights Awards in full 

Date

Tuesday, December 14, 2021 - 7:30pm

Featured image

Bill of Rights Awards 2021 artwork

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Override default banner image

Bill of Rights Awards 2021 artwork

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Share Image

Bill of Rights Awards 2021 artwork

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

68

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Centered single-column (no sidebar)

Teaser subhead

The 2021 Bill of Rights Awards honored celebrities, activists, and leaders speaking truth to power.

Show list numbers

Food Oppression in the Orange County Jails

For almost two years, people incarcerated in Orange County jails have been issued bagged, cold meals every day consisting of slimy bologna, no matter if it’s for breakfast, lunch, or dinner. And all too often, it is served on bread that is rotting, moldy and even, at times, infested with bugs. 

Not only are these meals hugely unappetizing, they are also unhealthy because of their extremely high levels of sodium and cholesterol.

A new report, “Cold, Rotting, & Moldy Meals: Food Oppression in the Orange County Jails,” was produced by the Stop the Musick Coalition that investigated the inhumane food situation in the jails overseen by the Orange County Sheriff’s Department (OCSD). 

Download the report (.pdf)

Coalition members used a Public Records Act request to obtain official documents from the OCSD and they conducted interviews with people who had been incarcerated in the jail system.

The report finds that:

  • The jail kitchens were closed in March 2020, and hot meals still have not been fully reinstated.
  • The jails have been serving cold and frequently moldy or rotting bologna sandwiches for every meal.
  • The meals offer poor nutrition and contain excessive levels of sodium.
  • During this time, OCSD has saved significant funds (almost $1 million in 2020) allocated to the food service budget.
  • During this time, despite an almost-50 percent drop in the jail population, the commissary store has continued to bring in consistently high revenue by selling snack food items that many incarcerated people, if they can afford it, purchase to supplement the bagged meals.

The Stop the Musick Coalition consists of individuals and organizations committed to decarceration in Orange County. The coalition opposes the reopening and expansion of the now empty James A. Musick Facility that would add more than 3,000 jail beds to OC’s current jail capacity and cost more than $280 million in state and county funds. 

Members of the coalition that contributed to this jails food report include the ACLU SoCal, CLUE: Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice, Housing is a Human Right OC, Orange County Rapid Response Network, Transforming Justice OC, and Underground Grit.
 

Date

Tuesday, December 14, 2021 - 4:00pm

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Related issues

Jails Project Criminal Justice and Drug Policy Reform

Documents

Show related content

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Type

Menu parent dynamic listing

69

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Standard with sidebar

Show list numbers

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU of Southern California RSS