Chamorro v. Dignity Health is a case that challenges religious refusals of reproductive health care to patients.

The ACLU and the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP filed a lawsuit against Dignity Health for the hospital chain’s use of religious directives to deny basic reproductive health care to its patients. Filed on behalf of patient Rebecca Chamorro and Physicians for Reproductive Health, the suit argues that withholding pregnancy-related care for reasons other than medical considerations is illegal in California.

Chamorro, a patient at Mercy Medical Center in Redding, decided with her doctor that she would get a tubal ligation during her scheduled C-section in late January. But the hospital refused her doctor’s request to perform the procedure, citing religious directives that classify sterilization procedures as  “intrinsically evil.” The refusal creates a clear conflict between the best interests of patients and the directives written by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.

Catholic hospital chains have rapidly expanded over the past 15 years and their interference with the doctor-patient relationship presents a real threat to women’s ability to access basic healthcare across the country.

On April 25, 2022, the trial court ruled that the California law on when hospitals could deny sterilizations permitted hospitals to deny tubal ligations based on religious reasons. However we were able to obtain information during the case that revealed the extent to which Dignity Health permits religious rules to interfere with medical decision making.

Case Developments

RULING
April 25, 2022
Statement of Decision from the Court. 

FILING
September 13, 2021
 Respondent's Post-Hearing Response Brief.

FILING
September 13, 2021
 Petitioners' Post-Hearing Response Brief.

FILING
August 6, 2021
 Respondent's Post-Hearing Opening Brief.

FILING
August 6, 2021
 Petitioners' Post-Hearing Opening Brief.

FILING
May 5, 2021
 Respondent's Reply Brief, Hearing on Petition for Writ of Mandate.

FILING
May 5, 2021
 Petitioners' Reply Brief, Hearing on Petition for Writ of Mandate.

FILING
October 7, 2020
Respondent's Open Brief, Hearing on Petition for Writ of Mandate. 

FILING
October 7, 2020
Petitioners' Open Brief, Hearing on Petition for Writ of Mandate. 

FILING
March 1, 2017
Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate.

FILING
April 27, 2016
Read the CMA Intervention Complaint.

FILING
April 27, 2016
Read the Memo of Points & Authorities in Support of CMA's Motion for Leave to File Complaint in Intervention.

FILING
March 2, 2016
Read the amended complaint.

FILING
December 28, 2015
Read the complaint.

Pro Bono Law Firm(s)

Covington & Burling LLP

Date filed

December 28, 2015

Court

Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Francisco

Status

Closed

Case number

CHC 15-549626